A Comparative Analysis of Legislative Criminal Policies in Iran and the United Kingdom in Addressing Cryptocurrency-Related Financial Crimes

Authors

    Abbas Faghih PhD Student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
    Abbas Barzegarzadeh * Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran abbasbarzegar60@gmail.com
    Maryam Safaei Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran

Keywords:

Cryptocurrencies, financial crimes, legislative criminal policy, Iran, United Kingdom, anti-money laundering (AML), know your customer (KYC), cryptocurrency regulation

Abstract

This article is aimed at conducting a comparative analysis of the legislative criminal policies of Iran and the United Kingdom in the domain of financial crimes associated with cryptocurrencies. The principal objective is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of both legal systems and to offer practical recommendations for improving Iran's laws and legislative policies in confronting crypto-related offenses. The study employs a comparative legal research methodology along with legal analysis. The research is based on library sources, domestic and international laws and regulations, as well as the analysis of legal cases from both countries. Additionally, a descriptive-analytical approach is used to evaluate the impact of current laws on the prevention and control of cryptocurrency crimes. The findings indicate that the United Kingdom, through the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and international cooperation, has succeeded in developing a comprehensive framework for cryptocurrency oversight. This framework includes anti-money laundering (AML) requirements, know-your-customer (KYC) protocols, and the application of modern technologies such as blockchain analytics. In contrast, Iran, due to the absence of comprehensive legislation and weaknesses in institutional coordination, has been unable to effectively utilize cryptocurrencies in the prevention of financial crimes. To better manage cryptocurrency-related challenges in Iran, the formulation of clear legislation, enhanced coordination among regulatory bodies, and the integration of advanced technologies are deemed essential. The experience of the United Kingdom demonstrates that striking a balance between innovation and regulation can serve as an effective strategy for combating cryptocurrency-related crimes.

References

Boyko, A., Dotscenko, T., & Dolia, Y. (2022). Patterns of financial crimes using cryptocurrencies. Socio-Economic Relations in the Digital Society, 2(44), 23-28.

De Meijer, C. R. W. (2016). The UK and Blockchain technology: A balanced approach. Journal of payments strategy & systems, 9(4), 220-229.

Dyntu, V., & Dykyi, O. (2018). Cryptocurrency in the system of money laundering. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(5), 75-81.

Fletcher, E., Larkin, C. J., & Corbet, S. (2020). Cryptocurrency regulation: Countering money laundering and terrorist financing. Available at SSRN 3704279.

Gofur, A., & Sumedang, S. A.-S. a. S. (2024). HUKUM DAN TEKNOLOGI. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, 165.

Huang, H.-M., Chen, S., & Yu-xia, Z. (2021). An Analysis of China’s International Competitiveness in Competitive Sports Industry by Means of Mathematical Modeling. Converter, 350-356. https://doi.org/10.17762/converter.186

Ibrahim, O. (2024). Cryptocurrency; the new unleashed financial instrument, should it be regulated. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 12(2), 303-317.

Javadi, Y., & Tajik, A. (2008). Blockchain Based Technology and its Effect on Education in Iran. International Journal of English Labguage, 7(4), 78-87.

Malala, J., & Adeyemo, F. (2024). Rethinking Crypto-Regulation for Crypto-Investors in the UK. In Commercial Banking in Transition: A Cross-Country Analysis (pp. 265-282). Springer.

Maxson, S., Davis, S., & Moulton, R. (2019). UK Cryptoassets Taskforce publishes its final report. Journal of Investment Compliance, 20(2), 28-33.

Meszka, J. (2023). On modern crime – money laundering and cryptocurrencies. Ius et Admini, 45(2-4), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.15584/iuseta.2021.2-4.1

Motsi-Omoijiade, I. D. (2022). Cryptocurrency regulation: a reflexive law approach. Routledge.

Nadir Babazade, T., & Baku State University, m. (2022). Kriptovalyuta əməliyyatlarinda çirkli pullarin yuyulmasi ilə mübarizənin hüquqi problemləri. Scientific Research, 10(6), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.36719/2789-6919/10/55-59

Oseni, U. A., & Ali, S. N. (2019). Fintech in Islamic finance. In Fintech in Islamic finance (pp. 3-14). Routledge.

Papadaki, M., & Karamitsos, I. (2021). Blockchain technology in the Middle East and North Africa region. Information Technology for Development, 27(3), 617-634.

Sadeghi, H., & Naser, M. (2020). Guaranteeing Ownership in the Evolutions of Registration Systems with a Comparative Study of the Registry System in Scotland, United Kingdom, United States and Iran. Journal of Legal Research, 19(43), 267-296.

Silva, E. C., & Mira da Silva, M. (2022). Research contributions and challenges in DLT-based cryptocurrency regulation: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 6(1), 63-82.

Tomanek, S., & Rirsch, R. (2022). New Aml regulation: From ‘virtual currency’to ‘crypto assets'—differentiation from tokenised financial instruments and potential concerns over the perceived end of pseudonymity in the crypto sector. Journal of Financial Compliance, 5(4), 350-358.

Trozze, A., Kamps, J., Akartuna, E. A., Hetzel, F. J., Kleinberg, B., Davies, T., & Johnson, S. D. (2022). Cryptocurrencies and future financial crime. Crime Science, 11, 1-35.

Verma, H. (2024). The Impact of Cryptocurrency on Money Laundering Practices. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 5(2), 51-60.

Xing, Y. (2022). Digital Currency Supervision Based on Blockchain Technology: A Literature Review. SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214803030

Zhelekhovska, T. (2023). Legal regulation of cryptocurrency and cryptocurrency operations in the European Union. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights(6), 201-207.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

Submitted

2024-11-28

Revised

2025-01-18

Accepted

2025-02-02

How to Cite

Faghih, A. ., Barzegarzadeh, A., & Safaei, M. . (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Legislative Criminal Policies in Iran and the United Kingdom in Addressing Cryptocurrency-Related Financial Crimes. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 4(1), 1-10. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/157

Similar Articles

1-10 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.