Unregulated Decarceration and Its Consequences (Focusing on the Law on the Reduction of Discretionary Prison Sentences, Enacted in 2020)

Authors

    Seyyed Mohammad Reza Hassannia Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
    Kiomars Kalantari * Master, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Babolsar Branch, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran. kalantar@nit.ac.ir
    Abolhassan Shakeri Master, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Babolsar Branch, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

Keywords:

decarceration, lack of regulation, private justice, non-deterrence of punishments, monetary penalties, Law on the Reduction of Discretionary Prison Sentences

Abstract

The latest legislative initiative in the realm of decarceration policy is the enactment of the Law on the Reduction of Discretionary Prison Sentences in 2020. The primary objective of this legislation is to adopt a decarceration approach and maximize minimalism concerning prison sentences. This study employs a descriptive-analytical method to examine the foreseeable consequences of the decarceration measures implemented under this law. It appears that, due to the lack of a systematically defined alternative sentencing framework, failure to adhere to the principle of proportionality between crime and punishment, and the absence of necessary infrastructural preparation following the early release of offenders, this approach lacks essential regulatory standards and contradicts the principles of criminal justice. The present research, based on thorough analysis and description, concludes that the effects of formulating such an unregulated and hasty criminal policy include emboldening individuals to commit crimes, the resurgence of private justice, the creation of opportunities for judicial corruption, an increase in recidivism among dangerous and habitual offenders, and evasion of punishment enforcement. Therefore, the law’s objective of decarceration at any cost does not align with prudent legislative practices and diminishes the deterrent effect of criminal sanctions. Consequently, this study offers specific recommendations to the legislature, suggesting that the goal of reducing prison sentences should be pursued within the framework of recognized principles and standards of criminal law.

References

Ardabili, M. A. (2003). General Criminal Law, Vol. 1.

Ardabili, M. A. (2021). General Criminal Law, Vol. 3 (Twenty-Fifth Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Asadi, L., & Popak Dabestani, K. (2017, September 18-19). Pathology of Alternative Sentences to Imprisonment at the Sentencing Stage. Third Conference on Law and Judicial Studies, Pardis International Development Idea Millennium.

Asghari, Z. (2014). Decarceration and Its Role in Preventing Recidivism. Crime Prevention Studies Journal, 33, 123-146.

Ashouri, M. (2007). The Role of Prison in Contemporary Criminal Policy (First Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Ashouri, M. (2015). Alternatives to Prison or Intermediate Sanctions (Third Edition ed.). Gerayesh Publishing.

Baric, M. (2000). Proportionality in Sentencing: Its Justification, Meaning and Role. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 12, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2000.12036187

Beccaria, C. (2014). On Crimes and Punishments (Seventh Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Damghani, M. T. (1960). The Disadvantages of Sentence Reduction and the Advantages of Conditional Release. Bar Association Journal, 70, 6-9.

Gholami, H. (2006). Recidivism (First Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Heidari, A. M. (2015). General Criminal Law (A Jurisprudential-Legal Review of Reactions to Crime) (First Edition ed.). SAMT Publishing.

Izadi Nasab, N. (1967). Proportionality in Sentencing and the Relationship between Punishment and Conduct. Judicial Monthly, 14, 36-40.

Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (2000). Legal Terminology (Sixth Edition ed.). Ganj Danesh Publishing.

Kalantari, K. (2004). Private Criminal Justice in the Iranian Penal System (First Edition ed.). SAMT Publishing.

Kashani, S. M. (2004). Global Judicial Standards (First Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Mahdavi Pour, A. (2016). Differentiated Criminal Policy in the Realm of Economic Crime (Second Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Marvasti, Y. (1966). Mitigating Circumstances of Punishment. Ministry of Justice Legal Journal, 1, 43-49.

Mohammad Nasl, G. (2005). Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. Law Enforcement Science Quarterly, 24, 119-153.

Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2009). New Penology, New Criminology: An Introduction to Managerial Risk-Based Criminal Policy (First Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H., & Hashem Beiki, H. (2016). Criminology Encyclopedia (Fourth Edition ed.). Ganj Danesh Publishing.

Niazpour, A. H. (2008). Deprivation of Social Rights in the Bill on Alternative Sentences to Imprisonment: A Reflection of the Empowering Function of Community-Based Punishments. Judiciary Legal Journal, 64, 113-130.

Nourbaha, R. (2006). Fundamentals of General Criminal Law (Sixteenth Edition ed.). Ganj Danesh Library.

Sadeghi, V. (2020). The Theory of Decarceration Justification Based on Rights and Expediency (M. Nasrin, Ed. First Edition ed.). Mizan Publishing.

Safari, A. (2017). Penology.

Shahin Moghadam, A. (2020). The Function of Punishments (First Edition ed.). Vice Presidency for Legal Affairs.

Tavassoli Zadeh, T. (2013). Prevention of Economic Crimes (First Edition ed.). Jungle Publications.

Von Hirsch, A. (1992). Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment. Crime and Justice, 16, 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1086/449204

Von Hirsch, A. (1993). From Why Punish? To How Punish? (Vol. 12). Dufl, Antony. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504956

Yazdian Jafari, J. (2008). The Principle of Proportionality between Crime and Punishment: Reasons and Mechanisms. Nameh Mofid Journal, 67, 139-156.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-27

Submitted

2024-06-03

Revised

2024-07-02

Accepted

2024-07-15

How to Cite

Hassannia, S. M. R. ., Kalantari, K., & Shakeri, A. . (2024). Unregulated Decarceration and Its Consequences (Focusing on the Law on the Reduction of Discretionary Prison Sentences, Enacted in 2020). Legal Studies in Digital Age, 3(2), 165-178. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/111

Similar Articles

1-10 of 71

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.