Critiques of the Guardian Council in the Process of Shari’a Supervision over Laws and Regulations

Authors

    Iraj Ahmadi Rad Department of Public Law, Si.C., Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran
    Moien Sabahi Goraghani * Department of Law, Ke.C., Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran moiensabahi@iauk.ac.ir
    Tayebeh Balvardi Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Si.C., Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran

Keywords:

Guardian Council, , Shari’a supervision, laws and regulations, Islamic Consultative Assembly (Parliament)

Abstract

The practice of the Guardian Council in reviewing the enactments of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Parliament) with respect to Shari’a is as follows: all articles or provisions of bills are examined individually in light of jurisprudential principles, and any provisions found to be in conflict with Shari’a are returned to the Parliament for amendment. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study is to examine the critiques raised against the Guardian Council in the process of Shari’a supervision over laws and regulations. This study employs a descriptive-analytical method, relying on library sources. The analysis revealed that opponents of Shari’a supervision have developed their arguments on the basis of Imami theological principles in two entirely distinct and separate ways. Some critics maintain that the institution of supervision is in direct contradiction with the foundations of legitimacy and governance in Islam, arguing that popular control is incompatible with the philosophy of Imamate, particularly the doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist). The other group does not reject the principle of supervision in the structure of a religious government but rather argues that the Guardian Council’s supervision is inconsistent with religious elements. In general, it can be stated that the critique directed at the supervision of jurists (the Hayʾat-e Ṭarāz) over the enacted laws of the Parliament lies in the fact that no reliable Islamic source confirms that in customary, political, or governmental matters, five jurists must examine whether there is any contradiction with Shari’a rulings. Furthermore, neither the Constitution nor other laws foresee that authorities or individuals can request the Guardian Council to examine and issue an opinion on the conformity or non-conformity of an enacted law with the Constitution or with Shari’a principles. Likewise, such authority has not been explicitly granted to the Guardian Council itself.

References

Abbasi, B. (2014). Foundations of Constitutional Law (3rd ed.). Jangal Publications, Javidaneh.

Bahrami Ahmadi, H. (2004). The History of the Codification of the Civil Code. Imam Sadegh University Research Journal(24).

Bakhshayeshi Ardestani, A. (2016). The Principles of Political Science (4th ed.). Avaye Noor Publications.

Bashiriyeh, H. (2018). Teaching Political Knowledge (Foundations of Theoretical and Foundational Political Science). Negah-e Moaser Publications.

Danesh Kia, M. H. (2009). Examining the Implementation of the Second Principle of the Supplement to the Constitutional Law. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Islamic Revolution Studies, 5(16).

Elhami Nia, A. A. (1991). Primary, Secondary, and Governmental Edicts. Journal of Educators, 1(3).

Hedayat Nia, F. (2013). The Guardian Council's Supervision of Laws and Regulations. Ravaq-e Andisheh(11).

Herisi Nejad, K. (2018). Comparative Constitutional Law. Aydin Publications.

Kadivar, M. (2003). The Guardian Council's Veto of Parliamentary Law. Baztab-e Andisheh(43).

Katouzian, N. (2007). Ethics and Law. Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology(1 & 2).

Khosrowshahi, G. (2011). Philosophy of Law (11th ed.). Imam Khomeini Institute Publications.

Madani, J. (2013). Foundations and Generalities of Law (19th ed.). Payda Publications.

Mehrpour, H. (2011). Handout on the Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Faculty of Islamic Studies and Law, Imam Sadegh University

Mehrpour, H. (2012). A Review of the Collection of the Guardian Council's Opinions (Vol. 1). Kayhan Publications.

Motahhari, M. (2019). An Overview of Islamic Sciences (Theology-Mysticism-Practical Philosophy) (Vol. 2). Sadra Publications.

Rafsanjani Moghadam, H. (2009). A Comparative Study of the Guardian Council (Iran) and the Constitutional Council (France). Human Sciences (Imam Hossein University)(53).

Research Center of the Guardian, C. (2002). A Collection of the Guardian Council's Opinions.

Sanei, P. (2012). Law and Society (1st ed.). Tarh-e No Publications.

Shamsa, A. (2012). The Anatomy of Power (2nd ed.). Negaresh Publications.

Tabatabaie Motameni, M. (2018). Administrative Law (42nd ed.). SAMT Publications.

Yazdi, M. (2016). The Constitution for Everyone (3rd ed.). Amir Kabir Publications.

Yousefi, A. A. (2018). The Nature of Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong. Islamic Culture and Thought Research Institute Publications.

Zarei, M. H. (1997). An Analysis of the Link Between Administrative Law and Public Management Based on the Rule of Law. Public Management Journal of the Management and Planning Organization(38).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-24

Submitted

2025-06-16

Revised

2025-09-02

Accepted

2025-09-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ahmadi Rad, I. ., Sabahi Goraghani, M., & Balvardi, T. . (2025). Critiques of the Guardian Council in the Process of Shari’a Supervision over Laws and Regulations. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-10. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/199

Similar Articles

1-10 of 131

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.