Explaining the Challenges of the International Legal System in the Digital Age
Keywords:
Digital Age, Cyber Sovereignty, Open Internet, Global Platforms, Human RightsAbstract
Technological developments in the 21st century have confronted the traditional structure of the international legal system with unprecedented challenges. The advent of the digital age—characterized by the expansion of cyberspace, the empowerment of global platforms, the transformation of warfare patterns and security threats, and the emergence of new concepts such as “cyber sovereignty” and “digital human rights”—necessitates a serious reconsideration of existing legal concepts and mechanisms. Within this context, six fundamental challenges can be identified: the absence of clear sovereignty in cyberspace, ambiguity in the application of international responsibility rules, the inability to guarantee and protect human rights in the digital environment, the lack of effective regulation over the operation of global platforms, the absence of international consensus regarding behavioral norms in cyberspace, and finally, the fundamental transformation of the concept of war and international security. These challenges not only underscore the relative inefficiency of traditional international law in confronting digital developments, but also highlight the urgent need to revise its principles, sources, and actors. If the international community fails to design new mechanisms to respond to these developments, the risk of eroding international trust, increasing legal inequality, and the emergence of new global tensions will escalate. Accordingly, the future of international law hinges on its ability to adapt to the complex realities of the digital world.
References
Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001
Bradshaw, S., Millard, C., & Walden, I. (2015). Contracts for clouds: Comparison and analysis of the terms and conditions of cloud computing services. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(3).
Chander, A., & Le, U. P. (2015). Data Nationalism. Emory law Journal, 64(3).
Council of, E. (2001). Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185).
Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford University Press.
De Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2012). The proposed data protection regulation replacing Directive 95/46/EC: A sound system for the protection of individuals. Computer Law & Security Review, 28(2).
Deibert, R. (2019). The road to digital unfreedom: Three painful truths about social media. Journal of Democracy, 30(1).
DeNardis, L. (2014). The Global War for Internet Governance. Yale University Press.
Gorwa, R. (2019). The platform governance triangle: Conceptualising the informal regulation of online content. Internet Policy Review, 8(2).
Hathaway, O. A., Crootof, R., Levitz, P., Nix, H., Perdue, W., & Spiegel, A. (2012). The Law of Cyber-Attack. California Law Review, 100(4).
Healey, J. (2011). A Fierce Domain: Conflict in Cyberspace, 1986 to 2012. Cyber Conflict Studies Association.
International Law, C. (2001). Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.
Jensen, E. T. (2015). Cyber sovereignty: The way ahead. Texas International Law Journal, 50(3).
Kaye, D. (2019). Speech Police: The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet. Columbia Global Reports.
Kello, L. (2017). The Virtual Weapon and International Order. Yale University Press.
Kleffner, J. K., & Dinniss, H. M. (2013). Targeting in cyberspace: Legal challenges. Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 43.
Kleinwächter, W. (2004). Beyond ICANN vs. ITU? How WSIS Tries to Enter the New Territory of Internet Governance. COMMUNICATIONS & STRATEGIES, 56(4).
Kulesza, J. (2017). Due diligence in cyberspace: A comparative law perspective. Netherlands International Law Review, 64(1).
Kuner, C. (2015). Transborder data flows and data privacy law. Oxford University Press.
Lewis, J. A. (2014). Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare: Preliminary Assessment of National Doctrine and Organization. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.
Lin, H. (2012). Offensive Cyber Operations and the Use of Force. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 4(1).
McGregor, L. (2021). Data-driven discrimination at work. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 70(1).
Mueller, M. (2010). Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance. MIT Press.
Perry, A., & Olsson, J. (2021). The future of human rights in the digital age: Challenges and opportunities. Human Rights Review, 22.
Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. W. W. Norton & Company.
Schmitt, M. N. (2013). Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139169288
Schmitt, M. N. (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822524
Segal, A. (2017). The Hacked World Order: How Nations Fight, Trade, Maneuver, and Manipulate in the Digital Age. Public Affairs.
Suzor, N. (2019). Lawless: The Secret Rules That Govern Our Digital Lives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666428
Tikk, E., & Kerttunen, M. (2020). The Alleged Demise of the UN GGE: An Autopsy and Eulogy.
Tsagourias, N. (2016). Non-intervention, sovereignty and cyber operations. In N. Tsagourias & R. Buchan (Eds.), Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547396
Tsagourias, N., & Buchan, R. (2015). Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547396
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.
United, N. (2021). Report of the Open-ended Working Group on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security (A/75/816).
Wilde, R. (2004). The accountability of international organizations and human rights. In M. Ragazzi (Ed.), The Responsibility of International Organizations. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Akbar Adibi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
