Digitalization of the Tax System and Its Legal Requirements: A Comparative Study of Iran and the European Union

Authors

Keywords:

Tax Digitalization; Tax Administration; Taxpayer Rights; Data Protection; Automated Decision-Making; Iran; European Union; Digital Governance

Abstract

The digitalization of tax administration has transformed the mechanisms through which tax authorities identify taxpayers, collect information, assess liabilities, monitor compliance, and resolve disputes. Electronic registration, digital invoicing, integrated databases, automated reporting, algorithmic risk assessment, and artificial intelligence have increased administrative efficiency and enhanced the capacity of governments to combat tax evasion. At the same time, these developments have generated important legal concerns relating to legality, transparency, data protection, cybersecurity, procedural fairness, accountability, and effective taxpayer remedies. This study examines the legal requirements of tax-system digitalization through a comparative analysis of Iran and the European Union. Using a descriptive-analytical and comparative legal method, the study evaluates the legal foundations of digital tax administration, the Iranian framework governing electronic tax procedures and taxpayer information, and the European approach to digital taxation, administrative cooperation, data governance, and taxpayer rights. The findings indicate that Iran has made significant progress in developing digital tax infrastructure, particularly through electronic taxpayer systems, sales terminals, remote tax services, and increasingly integrated information mechanisms. However, the legal regulation accompanying this technological transformation remains comparatively fragmented, particularly in relation to personal-data protection, automated decision-making, algorithmic transparency, cybersecurity obligations, inter-agency data sharing, and procedural safeguards. The European framework demonstrates a more integrated approach in which tax digitalization operates alongside broader principles of proportionality, purpose limitation, transparency, good administration, human oversight, and effective judicial protection. The study concludes that Iran should move from a predominantly technology-centered model toward a rights-based model of digital tax governance. Such reform requires clearer statutory rules governing taxpayer data, automated decisions, electronic evidence, cybersecurity, notification procedures, administrative accountability, and meaningful human review, while ensuring that technological efficiency does not undermine tax justice or taxpayer rights.

References

Adelekan, O., Adisa, O., Ilugbusi, S., Obi, O., Awonuga, K., Asuzu, O. F., & Ndubuisi, N. (2024). Evolving tax compliance in the digital era: A comparative analysis of AI-driven models and blockchain technology in U.S. tax administration. Computer Science & It Research Journal, 5, 311-335. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i2.759

Allahyari Fard, A., & Parvin, K. (2024). Regulation of Value-Added Tax and Cryptocurrency Speculation in the European Union. Judiciary Law Journal, 88(126), 139-165. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2024.2000811.5268

Belahouaoui, R., & Attak, E. H. (2024). Exploring the relationship between taxpayers and tax authorities in the digital era: evidence on tax compliance behavior in emerging economies. International Journal of Law and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-02-2024-0064

de la Vega, D. A. G., & Jarrin, F. A. R. (2025). Taxation in the Digital Sector: Challenges and Opportunities for Tax and Economic Law. Revista Calamo(23), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.61243/calamo.23.465

Elahiyari Fard, A., & Parvin, K. (2024). Regulation of value-added tax and cryptocurrency speculation in the European Union. Judiciary Law Journal, 88(126), 139-165. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2024.2000811.5268

Ghasemi Bonabari, H. R., Goudarzi, A., Mousavi, Z., & Mohammadrezaei Ardakani, M. (2024). Justice-Oriented Indicators in the Tax System Based on Direct Tax and Value Added Tax Laws. Tax Quarterly, 32(62), 186-199.

Goudarzi, A., Mousavi, Z., & Mohammadrezaei Ardakani, M. (2024). Justice-Oriented Indicators in the Tax System Based on Direct Tax and Value Added Tax Laws. Tax Research Journal(110), 76-93.

Hajipour Kandaroud, A., Banaazadeh Ardebili, A., & Moradi Balargou, R. (2024). An Analysis of the New Tax Adjudication System in Iran with Reference to the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour. Modern Research in Administrative Law, 6(19), 385-412.

Harpaz, A. (2021). Taxation of the digital economy: Adapting a twentieth-century tax system to a twenty-first-century economy. Yale J. Int'l L., 46, 57. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/6747/02_Assaf_Harpaz_Taxation_of_the_Digital_Economy_.pdf%3Fsequence%3D2%26isAllowed%3Dy&ved=2ahUKEwjQzYfyoY-KAxVS6wIHHfi5J6gQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1yDqa5UsljJG-sZkYXnLQo

Kateryna, Y., & Kobylnik, D. (2024). Legal Approaches to Taxation of Transactions With Digital Assets in the EU: Experience for Ukraine. Law and Innovations(4 (48)), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2024-4(48)-1

Kobylnik, D., & Kateryna, Y. (2024). Legal Regulation of Taxation of Transactions With Digital (Virtual) Assets. Economics Finances Law, 10/2024(-), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2024.10.6

Lang, M., & Risse, R. (2022). Tax law and digitization: how to combine legal tech and tax tech. Kluwer Law International BV. https://law-store.wolterskluwer.com/s/product/tax-law-and-digitalization-how-to-combine-legal-tech-and-tax-tech/01t4R00000Ok3GzQAJ?srsltid=AfmBOooNjHTeLFHfpGFfM506QgZIDpDYlev6ML6AyaGuSRiVgQoBvKBK

Mohammadi, F., Zarei, M. H., & Najjarzadeh Henjani, M. (2023). Transformation in the Tax System and Issues Facing National Security in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Comparative Research in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 4(5).

Olamide, A. A. L., Olugbenga, A. F., Salome, E. N., & Kolawole, T. O. (2024). Taxation Issue in a Digital Economy: An Overview and Perspective of Selected Countries. Public Administration and Regional Studies, 17(1), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.47743/pars.2024.17.1.6847

Paknejad, A., Bahrami Hasanabadi, M., & Bamati Tousi, A. (2023). Principles and rules for interpreting tax laws.

Pourhassan, F., Zadeh, A. H., & Sanavi Gorousian, V. (2024). Examining the Effect of Implementing the Law on Sales Terminals and the Taxpayer System on Taxpayer Satisfaction with the Mediating Role of Non-Presence Services of Tax Systems: A Case Study of Taxpayers of the General Tax Administration of Razavi Khorasan Province Torbat Heydariyeh. https://civilica.com/doc/2211747 https://civilica.com/doc/2211747

Saragih, A. H., Reyhani, Q., Setyowati, M. S., & Hendrawan, A. (2023). The Potential of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Application for the Tax Administration System's Modernization: The Case of Indonesia. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09321-y

Sharifi, Z. A. (2023). Constructive factors of tax crimes in the laws of Iran and Afghanistan. Islamic Sciences, Criminal Law, and Criminology Bi-quarterly, 7(16), 14.

Vitiuk, M. (2024). Tax Residence in the Era of E-Residency and Digital Nomads: International Experience and Ukrainian Context. Naukma Research Papers Law, 13, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2024.13.3-14

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pashaei Moghaddam, A. ., Rostami, V. ., & Mirzadeh Kohshahi, N. . (2027). Digitalization of the Tax System and Its Legal Requirements: A Comparative Study of Iran and the European Union. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-16. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/498

Similar Articles

51-60 of 353

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.