A Comparative Study of the Contractual Liability of E-Commerce Platforms Toward Consumers in Iranian Law and European Union Law
Keywords:
contractual liability, e, commerce platform, consumer rights, comparative study, European Union, Digital Services Act (DSA)Abstract
The expansion of e-commerce platforms and their intermediary role has turned the contractual liability of these platforms toward consumers into a major legal challenge. This study aimed to comparatively analyze the foundations, scope, and mechanisms of this liability in Iranian law and European Union law and to propose context-specific solutions for Iran. The study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical and comparative method, with library-based data collected from primary sources, namely legislation, and secondary sources, including articles and books. The legal frameworks of Iran and the European Union, with emphasis on recent regulations such as the DSA and the DMA, were analyzed and then systematically compared. In addition to the analysis of positive law, the judicial practice of Iranian courts and the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union were examined to clarify the limits of the liability of digital intermediaries. The economic dimensions of risk allocation and the effects of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and personal data protection, on the scope of platforms’ contractual obligations were also investigated. The findings revealed a deep gap between the two legal systems. Iranian law has a fragmented, ambiguous framework that lacks effective enforcement guarantees, whereas the European Union has established transparent mechanisms and powerful supervisory authorities through a preventive, integrated approach based on “responsible governance.” The European model is characterized by proactive and tiered obligations imposed on platforms according to their size and impact. To keep pace with the digital economy, Iran’s legal system requires fundamental reform. Enacting comprehensive legislation, establishing a specialized and powerful regulatory authority, implementing rapid dispute-resolution mechanisms, and adopting a conditional tiered liability regime are among the essential solutions inspired by European experience for creating legal certainty and ensuring the balanced development of e-commerce in Iran.
References
Bertolini, A., Episcopo, F., & Cherciu, N. A. (2021). Liability of online platforms.
de Araujo Meirelles Magalhaes, F., & Calle, I. M. (2023). Consumer Protection in the Digital Age: A Reflection on Regulation 2022/2065 (Digital Services Act-DSA) and Agenda 2030. In International Conference a Digital Europe for Citizens, Data Governance, Digital Markets, Digital Services (pp. 171-188). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Edalatjou. (2025). Legal Liability of E-Commerce Platforms and Protection of Consumer Rights from Legal and Jurisprudential Perspectives. Scientific Journal of Law and Modern Studies, e728694.
Fairgrieve, D., Busch, C., Buyuksagis, E., Garrett, Z. G., & Straetmans, G. (2024). Product liability and online marketplaces: Comparison and reform. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 73(2), 477-504.
Frosio, G., & Geiger, C. (2023). Taking fundamental rights seriously in the Digital Services Act's platform liability regime. European Law Journal, 29(1-2), 31-77.
Ghasemipour, L. (2025). Examining the Legal Liability of E-Commerce Platforms in Disclosing Customers' Commercial Data: A Comparative Approach in Cyber Law and Commercial Law Systems.
Hessam, Madibo, J., Miri, Yemerli, & Saleh. (2021). Civil Liability of Online Platforms Arising from Users' Violation of Informational Privacy: A Comparative Study in Iran, the United States, and the European Union. Communication Research, 28(107), 69-91.
Hosseini, M., Ayoubi, S., & Taleghan, G. (2023). Civil Liability of Online Stores in Iranian Law and a Comparative Case Study in the European Union. Private Law Research, 12(44), 255-284.
Ivannikov, I. (2025). Information Intermediary and Marketplace Liability for Counterfeit Goods in E-Commerce. Emerging Frontiers Library for The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 7(12), 16-21.
Janmohammadi, S., Jan Mohamadi, R. A., & Hosseini, M. (2024). Analyzing the Legal Aspects of Content Contracts and Digital Services Emphasizing Consumer Rights Protection. Majlis and Rahbord, 31(118), 229-258.
Lefouili, Y., & Madio, L. (2022). The economics of platform liability. European Journal of Law and Economics, 53(3), 319-351.
Markou, C. (2017). Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights. In EU Regulation of E-Commerce (pp. 177-229). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Meskic, Z., Albakjaji, M., Omerovic, E., & Alhussein, H. (2022). Transnational consumer protection in E-commerce: Lessons learned from the European Union and the United States. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 13(1), 1-15.
Mirlouhi. (2025). Civil Liability of E-Commerce Platforms toward Consumers: A Comparative Study in Iranian Law and the Law of the United Arab Emirates. Private Law Teachings of Islamic Countries, 2(1), 17-38.
Rokh, C., Ansari, Ghabouli, D., & Khodabakhshi, S. (2025). Competent Court in Consumer Claims against Traders in Electronic Contracts under European Union and Iranian Law. Legal Studies, 17(1), 55-88.
Salehi, Zare, Atashneh, & Mansour. (2023). Examining the Regional and International Dimensions of Unfair Terms against Consumers in Electronic Contracts. Geography Quarterly: Regional Planning, 13(50), 174-183.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Seyed Nader Hosseini (Author); Amin Karimpour Aliabad; Ali Pourjavaheri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.