Material Elements of the Crime of Assault on the State’s Airspace: A Comparative Study

Authors

    Ameer Ali Abed Murshedi PhD Student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
    Mahmood Malmir * Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran dr.malmir1@gmail.com
    Ali Adil Ismail Kashef Al-Ghetaa Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Kufa, Kufa, Iraq
    Mahmood Ashrafy Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Keywords:

Crime of Assault, Contingency Model Design, Airspace Violation, Material Elements of the Crime

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive legal analysis of the crime of assault on the state’s airspace by examining the material element as articulated in criminal law theory and national legislation. Building on classical definitions of actus reus, the study explores how external physical conduct—such as unauthorized entry, deviation from air routes, low-altitude violations, misuse of transit and innocent passage, aircraft hijacking, and drone or missile incursions—constitutes the observable basis for criminal liability in the aerial domain. The research emphasizes that airspace violations generate both material results, including physical damage and safety hazards, and legal results, such as infringements on sovereignty, disruption of national security, and intelligence exposure. The analysis also details the evidentiary challenges in establishing causation, particularly in cases involving unmanned aerial vehicles, cyber interference, and ballistic missiles, where radar tracking, satellite imagery, and aviation logs play critical roles. A comparative study of Iraqi, Egyptian, and Emirati legislation reveals distinct approaches to defining and criminalizing airspace violations. Iraq provides a clear conceptual definition of the material element but lacks technological updates addressing drones and missiles. Egypt relies on sector-based aviation regulation without a unified doctrinal structure, creating fragmentation and interpretive challenges. The United Arab Emirates offers the most advanced framework, integrating international conventions, detailed domestic provisions, and modern technological controls governing UAVs and cyber threats. The findings demonstrate that modern airspace regulation requires cohesive legislative reform, strong alignment with international standards, and explicit recognition of emerging forms of aerial misconduct. The study concludes by proposing legislative pathways for strengthening national airspace protection in an era of rapidly evolving aerial technologies.

References

Ajmal, A. (2023). Insanity, Insanity Defense, and the Elements of Crime: A Review. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(III). https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-iii)46

Al-Tkhayneh, K. M. (2024). The Criminal Confrontation for Crimes of Discrimination and Hate Speech: A Comparative Study. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(2), 138-162. https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-7.2-a000210

Ali, S., & Saberi, R. (2020). The Relativistic Theory of Coincidence Between Mens Rea and Actus Reus in Islamic and English Law. East African Scholars Journal of Education Humanities and Literature, 3(10), 492-508. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjehl.2020.v03i10.001

Alkatbi, S. O., & Alkrisheh, M. A. (2024). Legislative Policy in the Face of Discrimination and Hate Crimes in UAE Law. Aau Journal of Business and Law, 8(1), 64-89. https://doi.org/10.51958/aaujbl2024v8i1p4

Barus, Y. J. (2021). Jurisdiction of a Country’s Air Territorry in International Law Perspective. Journal of Law Science, 3(3), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v3i3.1673

Cauia, A., & Bria, F. (2021). Mechanisms and Legal Instruments to Ensure Air Route Safety. The Journal of the National Institute of Justice(4(59)). https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2021.4(59).07

Drăniceru, M. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of “Mens Rea” of the Assault on Civil Servants. Across, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.35219/across.2022.5.1.09

Ibrahim, E., Sharif, H., & Aboelazm, K. S. (2025). Legal Confrontation of the Cyber Blackmail: A Comparative Study. JLSDGR, 5(2), e04039. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe04039

Jonas, L. A. (2021). Actus Reus and Mens Rea in International Criminal Law. 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004470934_004

Kamali, M. H. (2019). Shariah Punishments in Libya, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. 329-C333.P319. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190910648.003.0033

Kokha, A. Y. H. (2021). The Extent to Amount ISIL Acts Against Iraqi Minorities to Genocide. Revue Québécoise De Droit International, 32(2), 59-105. https://doi.org/10.7202/1075170ar

Mungan, M. C. (2022). Law, Criminal. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosl019.pub2

Munoz-Cordero, F. (2025). Tech-Enabled Sovereignty: Leveraging Innovation and Bilateral Defense Cooperation for Airspace Security in Colombia. Revista Científica Y Académica, 5(2), 2575-2591. https://doi.org/10.61384/r.c.a..v5i2.1299

Nahi, M. (2025). Losing Citizenship by Deprivation in the Framework of Private International Law: A Comparative Study. JLSDGR, 5(6), e06906. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n06.pe06906

Omer Abd Alnafea Khaleel, A.-B. (2023). Crimes Related to Voter Registration and Inclusion in Electoral Lists: a Comparative Legal Study (Syria, Egypt and Iraq). Теория И Практика Общественного Развития(12), 378-383. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2023.12.50

Sari, H. P. (2024). Indonesian Airspace Sovereignty; Perspective of Law No. 1 of 2009 on Aviation and the Flight Information Region (Fir) Agreement Between Indonesia and Singapore 2022. Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(3), 1702-1710. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5052

Vodolaskova, K., & Головко, С. Г. (2023). Historical Aspects and Overview of Legal Understanding of Airspace Sovereignty Concept. Scientific Works of National Aviation University Series Law Journal Air and Space Law, 1(66), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.66.17411

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2025-08-02

Revised

2025-12-07

Accepted

2025-12-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Murshedi, A. A. A., Malmir, M., Kashef Al-Ghetaa, A. A. I. ., & Ashrafy, M. . (2026). Material Elements of the Crime of Assault on the State’s Airspace: A Comparative Study. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-18. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/289

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 95

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.