Comparative Analysis of Joint Venture and International Consortium Construction Partnership Contracts: Challenges and Optimization Strategies

Authors

    Mohammad Shahriari Department of Private Law, Emirates Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Mohammad Hossein Erfanmanesh * Department of Private Law, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran mh.erfanmanesh@iauctb.ac.ir
    Shahab Jafari Nadushan Department of Private Law, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Joint Venture, International Consortium, partnership contracts, project management, infrastructure development, risk management, comparative analysis

Abstract

Joint Venture (JV) and International Consortium (IC) contracts are among the most common mechanisms for financing and managing such projects, as they enable the pooling of resources, risk-sharing, and the utilization of multilateral capacities to execute large-scale undertakings. However, in Iran, the legal, managerial, and operational structures of these contracts have faced numerous challenges, resulting in decreased efficiency and increased investment risks in infrastructure projects. The primary objective of this research is to conduct a comparative analysis of Joint Venture and International Consortium contractual models, identify the current challenges in Iran, and propose solutions for optimizing their legal and managerial frameworks. This study employs a descriptive–analytical approach and draws upon credible domestic and international academic sources to examine the theoretical foundations, prior research, and comparative analyses of partnership contracts. Using a comparative legal analysis, the study evaluates the implementation models of Joint Ventures and International Consortia in various countries and compares them with the existing Iranian legal frameworks. The findings reveal that a lack of alignment between domestic regulations and international standards, weaknesses in risk management, bureaucratic complexities, and insufficient clarity in the allocation of responsibilities are among the key obstacles to the successful execution of these contracts in Iran. While developed countries adopt integrated models and apply international standards for structuring partnership agreements, Iran continues to face significant legal, financial, and managerial barriers in this field. To enhance the effectiveness of these contracts in Iran, the research recommends reforming legal frameworks, standardizing managerial procedures, and incorporating innovative financing models into Joint Venture and International Consortium agreements. The results of this study can serve as practical guidance for policymakers, project managers, investors, and partnership-based companies, paving the way for improved management of collaborative contracts in Iran.

References

Badiru, A. B., & Osisanya, S. O. (2016). Project management for the oil and gas industry: A world system approach. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13755

Cai, Y. (2023). Towards a new model of EU-China innovation cooperation: Bridging missing links between international university collaboration and international industry collaboration. Technovation, 119, 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102553

Crupi, A., Del Sarto, N., Di Minin, A., Phaal, R., & Piccaluga, A. (2021). Open innovation environments as knowledge sharing enablers: the case of strategic technology and innovative management consortium. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1263-1286. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.12133abstract

Fidic. (2017). Conditions of contract for EPC/Turnkey projects (Silver Book). International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC).

Harris, F., McCaffer, R., & Edum-Fotwe, F. (2021). Modern construction management. Wiley-Blackwell.

International Chamber of Commerce. (2021). International commercial arbitration: A comparative introduction. ICC Publications.

Liu, W., Zhang, Y., & Xiong, W. (2020). Financing the belt and road initiative. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1716822

Loosemore, M., Raftery, J., Reilly, C., & Higgon, D. (2022). Risk management in projects. Taylor & Francis.

Mehrara, M., & Musai, M. (2021). Legal ambiguities in joint venture agreements in Iran: Comparative analysis with international standards. Iranian Journal of Legal Studies, 18(3), 87-112.

Nguyen, T., Nguyen, L. H., Chileshe, N., & Hallo, L. (2023). Investigating critical risk factors of selecting joint venture contractors for infrastructure projects implementation in Vietnam. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(14), 2438-2451.

Sharifi, H., & Abdi, F. (2023). Public-private partnership (PPP) models for financing infrastructure projects: Lessons for developing countries. International Finance Review, 28(5), 410-435.

Taheri, A., & Khosravi, A. (2023). Risk management frameworks in joint venture agreements: Application of PRINCE2 and PMBOK standards. Project Management Review, 17(2), 90-115.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2013). UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. United Nations.

Walker, D., & Rowlinson, S. (2019). Legal frameworks for international construction joint ventures: FIDIC and UNCITRAL applications. Journal of International Business Law, 32(4), 278-302.

Zhao, X., Nguyen, T., & Li, H. (2021). Comparative analysis of legal structures in international joint ventures: Best practices from the EU, US, and China. International Journal of Law and Economics, 25(3), 180-205.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

Submitted

2025-06-02

Revised

2025-10-03

Accepted

2025-10-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shahriari, M. ., Erfanmanesh, M. H., & Jafari Nadushan, S. . (2025). Comparative Analysis of Joint Venture and International Consortium Construction Partnership Contracts: Challenges and Optimization Strategies. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-13. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/249

Similar Articles

1-10 of 149

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.