<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Legal Studies in Digital Age</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume></Volume>
      <Issue>In Press</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2027</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Challenges in Determining the Law Applicable to Digital Assets in International Succession: With Emphasis on the Laws of Iran, the European Union, France, and the United States</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Challenges in Determining the Law Applicable to Digital Assets in International Succession: With Emphasis on the Laws of Iran, the European Union, France, and the United States</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>10</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>18</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;The proliferation of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), social media accounts, and cloud-stored data, has challenged traditional concepts of succession law. Classical succession rules, which are primarily designed for tangible property, lose much of their effectiveness when applied to the cross-border and intangible characteristics of digital assets. This article aims to propose a framework for resolving conflicts of laws in digital succession through a comparative approach. The study employs a descriptive-analytical method and comparatively examines the legal systems of Iran, the European Union, France, and the United States. The findings demonstrate that the mechanical application of a single law in this field is not feasible. By distinguishing the “right to inherit” from the “right of access,” the proposed six-layer framework establishes a balance among the heirs’ property rights, the deceased’s privacy, and platforms’ technical requirements. By presenting a legislative proposal for Iranian law, this article takes a step toward aligning succession rules with the exigencies of the digital age.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">international succession</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">conflict of laws</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">post-mortem privacy</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">digital assets</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">cryptocurrency</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">private international law</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">digital legacy</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/download/492/399</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
