<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Legal Studies in Digital Age</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>3</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 6</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Validity of Arbitration Clauses in Electronic Contracts</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Validity of Arbitration Clauses in Electronic Contracts</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>133</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>147</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>04</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;The growth of electronic commerce and the expansion of contract formation through digital platforms have raised new questions regarding the validity and nature of “arbitration clauses.” Arbitration, as one of the most significant private methods of dispute resolution, is incorporated into electronic contracts when the parties intend to submit potential future disputes to a neutral and mutually agreed third party instead of referring them to state courts. Nevertheless, the inclusion of such clauses in virtual environments faces important challenges due to characteristics such as the non-physical manifestation of consent, the use of data messages, electronic signatures, clickwrap and adhesion contracts, as well as issues concerning attribution and verification of genuine intent. Therefore, examining the validity of arbitration clauses in electronic contracts requires a simultaneous analysis of the foundations of contract law, arbitration rules, and electronic commerce regulations. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, this article demonstrates that, in terms of legal nature, the arbitration clause is more appropriately analyzed as a “condition involving a legal act” rather than as an independent condition or a condition of result, because the parties undertake a reciprocal legal obligation whose breach is subject to enforcement mechanisms provided under arbitration laws and procedural regulations. Furthermore, the principles of separability of the arbitration clause, competence-competence, and the functional equivalence of data messages to written documents constitute the principal foundations for the validity of such clauses in electronic environments. Nevertheless, the validity of arbitration clauses in electronic contracts is not absolute, and in situations involving ambiguous adhesion clauses, non-transparent references, the absence of attributable signatures, and conflicts with consumer rights protections, such clauses may face limitations or invalidity.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Arbitration Clause</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Electronic Contract</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Data Message</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Electronic Signature</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Separability of Arbitration Clause</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Competence-Competence</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/download/415/337</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
