<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Legal Studies in Digital Age</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>3</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 9</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>12</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>A Legal Analysis of the Challenges and Enforcement Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in the Iranian Judicial System</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>A Legal Analysis of the Challenges and Enforcement Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in the Iranian Judicial System</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>175</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>183</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/kman.lsda.3.4.16</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;The legal analysis of the challenges and enforcement mechanisms of electronic evidence in the Iranian judicial system reveals that with the expansion of digital technologies, electronic evidence has emerged as a modern tool in judicial proceedings. Despite advantages such as speed, accuracy, and ease of storage, electronic evidence faces challenges including authentication, data security, linguistic differences, and the large volume of information. In the Iranian judicial system, although laws such as the Electronic Commerce Act (2003) and the Computer Crimes Act (2009) have facilitated the recognition of electronic evidence, the enforcement of such evidence remains ambiguous due to insufficient technical and legal infrastructures. This study emphasizes the necessity of enacting comprehensive legislation, establishing appropriate technical infrastructures, and training judges and legal practitioners to effectively utilize electronic evidence, thereby fully safeguarding the rights of litigants and achieving fair trials.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">electronic evidence</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value"> Iranian judicial system</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">legal challenges</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">enforcement mechanisms</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">electronic litigation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value"> evidence authentication</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">data security</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Electronic Commerce Act</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Computer Crimes Act</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">fair trial</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/download/119/109</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
