Challenges in Determining the Law Applicable to Digital Assets in International Succession: With Emphasis on the Laws of Iran, the European Union, France, and the United States

Authors

Keywords:

international succession, conflict of laws, post-mortem privacy, digital assets, cryptocurrency, private international law, digital legacy

Abstract

The proliferation of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), social media accounts, and cloud-stored data, has challenged traditional concepts of succession law. Classical succession rules, which are primarily designed for tangible property, lose much of their effectiveness when applied to the cross-border and intangible characteristics of digital assets. This article aims to propose a framework for resolving conflicts of laws in digital succession through a comparative approach. The study employs a descriptive-analytical method and comparatively examines the legal systems of Iran, the European Union, France, and the United States. The findings demonstrate that the mechanical application of a single law in this field is not feasible. By distinguishing the “right to inherit” from the “right of access,” the proposed six-layer framework establishes a balance among the heirs’ property rights, the deceased’s privacy, and platforms’ technical requirements. By presenting a legislative proposal for Iranian law, this article takes a step toward aligning succession rules with the exigencies of the digital age.

References

Almasi, N. (2016). Public Policy in Iranian Private International Law. Comparative Law Journal, 7(1), 22-47.

Edwards, L., & Harbinja, E. (2016). Protecting Post-Mortem Privacy: Reconciling Data Protection and Inheritance. International Data Privacy Law, 6(1), 202-247.

Harbinja, E. (2020). Post-Mortem Privacy 2.0: Theory, Law, and Technology. International Data Privacy Law, 10(2), 93-108.

Hopkins, J. (2013). Afterlife in the Cloud: Managing Digital Legacy. Stanford Technology Law Review, 16(3), 601-628.

Katouzian, N. (2019). Inheritance. Ganj-e Danesh.

Mansel, H. P. (2022). Digital Succession in Private International Law. Journal of Private International Law, 18(1), 1-35.

Meltzer, K. (2021). Conflict of Laws in Digital Inheritance. Journal of Private International Law, 17(2), 442-477.

Nasiri, M. (2020). The Legal Status of Digital Assets in Iranian Jurisprudence and Law University of Tehran].

Perot, F. (2019). Digital Inheritance under French Law: The Law for a Digital Republic. European Review of Private Law, 27(3), 501-520.

Safaei, S. H., & Emami, A. (2017). Conflict of Laws in International Inheritance. International Legal Journal(36), 40-62.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rasoli Doghaheh , N. ., Almasi, N., & Boloori , P. . (2027). Challenges in Determining the Law Applicable to Digital Assets in International Succession: With Emphasis on the Laws of Iran, the European Union, France, and the United States. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-10. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/492

Similar Articles

1-10 of 341

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.