The Capacities of Participatory Criminal Policy in Addressing Public Protests in Iran: A Transition from Penal Control to Dialogue-Based Management

Authors

Keywords:

participatory criminal policy; public protests; right of assembly; dialogue-based management; civil society; social prevention; social mediation.

Abstract

The present study aims to elucidate the capacities of participatory criminal policy for addressing public protests in Iran in a proportionate, lawful, and low-conflict manner. The central research question is the extent to which participatory criminal policy can facilitate a transition from a punitive and control-oriented model of response to a dialogue-based model for managing protests. Employing a descriptive-analytical method and drawing on legal documents, library-based sources, and relevant theoretical literature, the study examines these capacities at three levels: legal, institutional, and social. The findings indicate that peaceful protest, within the framework of constitutional rights, should not be regarded merely as a matter of law enforcement or national security; rather, it may constitute one of the mechanisms through which citizens participate in the public sphere and convey social demands to formal decision-making structures. From this perspective, participatory criminal policy, by mobilizing the capacities of civil society, professional and occupational associations, the media, political parties, academics, non-governmental organizations, and other intermediary institutions, can contribute to conflict mitigation, the early identification of sources of public discontent, social mediation, and the prevention of the excessive criminalization of protests. Nevertheless, the implementation of this model in Iran requires the resolution of legislative ambiguities concerning public assemblies and demonstrations, effective guarantees of due process and fair trial, a clear distinction between peaceful protest and criminal conduct, coordination among responsible institutions, appropriate training for law enforcement personnel, and the establishment of a legally secure environment for the activities of civil society organizations. Within this framework, Article 27 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran can serve as an important legal basis for reinterpreting and reinforcing the right to hold peaceful assemblies and demonstrations.

References

Della Porta, D. (2020). Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism Back Into Protest Analysis. Polity Press.

Khaleghi, A., & Zare, A. (2023). Participatory Criminal Policy and the Role of Civil Institutions in Preventing Crimes Against Public Order. Quarterly Journal of Crime Prevention Studies, 18(66), 45-72.

Lazerges, C. (2003). An Introduction to Criminal Policy. Mizan Publications.

Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2022). Democratic Policing and Public Protest: Accountability, Governance, and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.

Najafi Abrandabadi, A.-H. (2004). Just Crime Prevention. In Collected Articles in Honor of Dr. Ashouri. SAMT.

Niazpour, A.-H. (2021). Criminal Law and Criminal Policy in the Mirror of Legislative Reforms. Mizan Publications.

Rahmdel, M. (2022). A Reflection on the Relationship Between Public Security and Fundamental Freedoms in Light of Article 27 of the Constitution. Judiciary Legal Journal, 86(118), 143-167.

Rostami, V. (2007). Public Participation in the Criminal Process: A Study of Criminal Policy in Western Countries. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Studies, 37(2), 250-275.

Rostami, V., & Mousavi, S. M. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Restrictions on the Right to Assembly and Protest in the Legal Systems of Iran and France. Quarterly Journal of Public Law, 52(3), 895-918.

Sadeghi, M., & Rezaei, A. (2024). Participatory Intervention of Intermediary Institutions in the Management of Social Crises: A Criminological and Sociological Analysis. University of Tehran Journal of Criminology and Criminal Policy, 9(2), 112-135.

Stott, C., & Radburn, M. (2021). Crowd Psychology, Policing and the Dynamics of Public Disorder. Current opinion in psychology, 40, 118-122.

Tyler, T. R. (2021). Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Public Protest. Princeton University Press.

Zedner, L. (2023). Security and Criminal Policy: Principles and Limits. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Azami, M. ., & Shekarchizadeh, M. (2027). The Capacities of Participatory Criminal Policy in Addressing Public Protests in Iran: A Transition from Penal Control to Dialogue-Based Management. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 1-19. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/478

Similar Articles

81-90 of 324

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.