Critical Analysis and New Solutions to the Jurisdictional Boundaries of the Administrative Justice Court Considering the Evolution of Administrative Justice Principles in Judicial Procedure

Abstract

In recent years, the principles of administrative justice have undergone fundamental transformations in the judicial practice of the Administrative Justice Court—developments that have directly influenced the determination of the Court’s jurisdictional boundaries and the procedures for handling administrative disputes. The purpose of this study is to critically examine the process of formation and evolution of these boundaries, with particular emphasis on emerging principles of administrative justice, in order to identify existing deficiencies and propose solutions aimed at enhancing the Court’s performance and procedural efficiency. The research employs a descriptive–analytical method, and data were primarily gathered through document analysis, review of significant judicial decisions, comparative examination of procedural trends, and consultation of authoritative legal sources. The findings indicate that, despite the relative expansion of the Court’s jurisdiction in accordance with new standards of administrative justice, ambiguities and weaknesses remain in defining the limits of jurisdiction, recognizing individuals’ vested rights, and establishing effective compensation mechanisms. Drawing on the experience of advanced legal systems and implementing legislative reforms, the Court’s role in ensuring administrative justice can be strengthened and its efficiency improved.