Transformation on the Battlefield: The Impact of Digital Technologies on International Humanitarian Law

Authors

    Somayeh Sadat Miri Lavasani * Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran s.mirilavasani@pnu.ac.ir

Keywords:

humanitarian law, digital age, emerging technologies, law of armed conflict, means of warfare

Abstract

Digital technologies have brought profound changes to international humanitarian law, presenting both significant opportunities and complex challenges. On one hand, technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence (AI), armed drones, and autonomous systems have enhanced the efficiency and precision of military and humanitarian operations, while enabling the monitoring and documentation of violations through satellite imagery, reporting applications, and open data. Additionally, emerging technologies such as blockchain have contributed to increased transparency and accountability in the management and tracking of humanitarian aid. On the other hand, these technologies have also introduced serious challenges. Among these are the difficulty in distinguishing combatants from civilians within cyberspace, ambiguity in attributing legal responsibility to states and non-state actors, and the lack of transparency in the decision-making algorithms used in smart weapons. These challenges necessitate a reexamination of the existing rules and interpretations of international humanitarian law to ensure the preservation of human control and legal accountability. Institutions such as the International Committee of the Red Cross and the United Nations are actively working to develop new legal frameworks to better respond to these developments. Ultimately, the responsible use of digital technology to strengthen the principles of humanitarian law requires precise legislation, comprehensive education, and effective monitoring of legal implementation. These approaches are essential to ensuring that human dignity and the protection of civilians are upheld in the digital age, and that international humanitarian law remains a credible and functional legal system.

References

Benvenisti, E. (2013). Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders. The American Journal of International Law, 107(2). https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0295

Björkdahl, A., & Buckley Zistel, S. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Conflict. Oxford University Press.

Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2018). Autonomous weapons systems and changing norms in international relations. Review of International Studies, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000614

Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the development of autonomy in weapon systems. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Brownsword, R. (2019). Law, Technology and Society: Reimagining the Regulatory Environment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351128186

Calo, R. (2016). Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3).

Cassese, A. (2008). International criminal law. Oxford University Press.

Crootof, R. (2016). War Torts: Accountability for Autonomous Weapons. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 164(6).

Dinstein, Y. (2016). The conduct of hostilities under the law of international armed conflict. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316389591

Dinstein, Y. (2020). The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge University Press.

Greenwood, C. (2020). The Law of Armed Conflict and the Use of Force. In C. Warbrick & C. Greenwood (Eds.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts. Oxford University Press.

Guberek, T., D'Ignazio, C., & Taylor, L. (2019). Data for humanitarian action: challenges and opportunities. International Review of the Red Cross, 101(911).

Henckaerts, J. M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary international humanitarian law: Volume I–Rules. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804700

Heyns, C. (2013). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.

Icrc. (2005). Customary international humanitarian law: Volume I–Rules. Cambridge University Press.

Icrc. (2016). Commentary on the First Geneva Convention. Cambridge University Press.

Icrc. (2018). International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts. ICRC.

Icrc. (2020). Autonomous Weapons Systems: Technical, Military, Legal and Humanitarian Aspects. ICRC.

Icrc. (2021). Autonomous weapon systems: Implications of increasing autonomy in the critical functions of weapons. International Committee of the Red Cross.

Kleffner, J. (2021). The Application of International Humanitarian Law to Cyber Operations. In Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kleinfeld, R., Peksen, D., & Waltz, J. (2017). Satellite Imagery and the Detection of Mass Atrocities. Journal of Peace Research, 54(2).

Kube, H., & Kühn, A. (2021). Cyber Attacks on Civilian Infrastructure: Legal Challenges under IHL. German Yearbook of International Law, 63(1).

Lewis, J. A. (2018). Cybersecurity and cyberwarfare: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.

Lubell, N., & Pejic, J. (2020). Human rights obligations and armed conflict: The interplay between international humanitarian law and international human rights law. International Review of the Red Cross, 102(913).

Margulies, P. (2019). Sovereignty and Cyber Attacks: Technology’s Challenge to the Law of Armed Conflict. Maryland Journal of International Law, 34(2).

Melzer, N. (2016). Interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law. International Committee of the Red Cross.

Milanovic, M. (2015). Attribution and the Law of Targeting. In E. Wilmshurst (Ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts. Oxford University Press.

Pagallo, U. (2013). The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6564-1

Roberts, A., & Guelff, R. (2000). Documents on the Laws of War. Oxford University Press.

Sassòli, M. (2019). International Humanitarian Law: Rules, controversies, and solutions to problems arising in warfare. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438553

Scharre, P. (2018). Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. W. W. Norton & Company.

Schmitt, M. N. (2013). Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139169288

Schmitt, M. N. (2020). The Principle of Distinction and New Warfare Technologies. In E. Wilmshurst (Ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts. Oxford University Press.

Schmitt, M. N., & Vihul, L. (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822524

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2017). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Portfolio.

Tikk, E., & Kerttunen, M. (2020). The Role of the UN in Addressing Cyber Threats: Towards a Cyber Stability Framework. Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

Tsagourias, N., & Buchan, R. (2015). Cyber War and International Law. Cambridge University Press.

Unga. (2019). Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.

Werbach, K., & Cornell, N. (2017). Contracts Ex Machina. Duke Law Journal, 67(2).

Wright, D., & Raab, C. (2014). Privacy and Surveillance: The Multidisciplinary Perspective. Springer.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25

Submitted

2024-11-05

Revised

2025-01-28

Accepted

2025-02-06

How to Cite

Miri Lavasani, S. S. (2025). Transformation on the Battlefield: The Impact of Digital Technologies on International Humanitarian Law. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 4(1), 1-10. https://www.jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/177

Similar Articles

11-20 of 133

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.